Since I’m still without an original thought extremely busy, I’m dragging another post out of the archives. I originally posted this on The Anthill some years ago. Feel free to smirk if you believe it merits such.
So I’m watching the news and a story comes on about an attempted robbery that left the suspect unconscious.
The cop being interviewed described the actions of the two guys involved: “One gentleman came out of his home and witnessed the other gentleman attempting to break into his car. They got into a struggle and at some point during the fight, the second gentleman was rendered unconscious.”
A very typical police-esque narrative. But for the life of me, I can’t quite understand why they have to refer to these guys as “gentlemen”. The thief certainly wasn’t being a gentleman. And since the story came out of a bad part of town, I have my doubts that the intended victim was a gentleman either. I could only loosely accept them being called “men” as that term implies a sense of upstanding behavior. These two would be rightly called “males”, “guys”, or “dudes” maybe. Not that the cops would use those words, but they should. It would make a lot more sense in my opinion.
I could only imagine them being gentlemen if their interaction were more civilized than it was.
It should have gone like this: Gentleman A, dressed in a grey pinstriped suit and sporting a bowler hat and a handlebar moustache, approaches Gentleman B, who is also sporting a handlebar moustache, is dressed in a pair of rough tweed trousers and an oxford cloth shirt with rolled up sleeves, and who is attempting to break into Gentleman A’s automobile.
“I say, my good man! Here now, what tomfoolery do you purpose toward my motorcar?”
“Right, then! Sir, my sincerest amandation is offered forthrightly, for my business is burglary of a sort most grievous.”
“Burglary indeed! The deuce you say! And can you attend no honest occupation save thievery?”
“Have a care, sir! Proffer your deductions elsewhere!”
“You sir, are a jackanape, and I shall give you a right proper fetch.”
“Ah, then fisticuffs will suffice to settle the matter.”
“Have at it then, good sir! You will find my pugnastics nigh upon insurmountable!”
Gentleman A then whacks gentleman B with a tire iron.
Now, if the scene went down like that, then I would accept them being referred to as gentlemen. Bonus points if the police officer reports the incident as a “row”.
Awesome.
*sigh*…The Anthill….those were the good ole’ days.
(MD) Yes. Yes, they were indeed.
Even though I remember this from days of yore, it is still quite amusing, and I daresay
quite civilized. A model for proper behavior while being found as scofflaws, righto?
(MD) Indubitably.
heehee. Maybe it can’t be done because we don’t have the right accents here?
(MD) Well, we certainly don’t have the right outfits anymore. I mean, who wears suspenders and cuff links these days?
I think you should have sold that to Monty Python. Excellent work.
(MD) Yeah… if only I’d written this about thirty years ago. And lived in the UK.
I remember this. You are too funny!!!
(Hubby) Looks aren’t everything.
I agree, very Monty Python, then again I just got through seeing Spamalot on stage the other day. BTW congrats on your own .com….
(MD) Thanks! I’m hoping I get the hang of doing the coding. Having the blog hosted at Blogger was like living in a condo; if there was ever a maintenance issue, I’d just call the super. Now, if the water heater leaks, I have to figure out how to fix it myself.
Laughing over here! Very funny, indeed. Your sense of humor is something else!
You are a clever one, Tom. I love it.
(MD) I try. And once in a while I succeed. Thank you!
Oh my god loved reading your post. I added your feed to my google reader!
(MD) Wilkommen! Hope you like to stick around and read more.